Courts can no longer automatically deny recognition of ownership by adverse possession solely on the grounds that the owner knew they had no registered right or that the property was publicly owned. Other circumstances evidencing bad faith must be proven, as well as the public owner's prolonged inaction. This opens up new opportunities for protecting the rights of long-standing owners, particularly in cases involving ownerless property.

The amendments will allow for a more accurate assessment of the risks and prospects of litigation related to challenging rights to privatized property.

It's important to explain to victims that if repairs cannot be completed within the limit and they refuse to pay extra, the compensation amount will be limited to the maximum insurance payout. It's also important to emphasize the insurer's obligation to prove that all reasonable measures were taken to arrange repairs, which can be a key factor in legal disputes.

Lawyers advising on issues of foreign economic activity and currency regulation should take into account the extension of these restrictions. It is important to inform clients about the applicable rules and exceptions, especially when planning financial transactions involving non-residents from unfriendly countries. Particular attention should be paid to the legal status of “In” type accounts and the possibilities of using ruble correspondent accounts for cross-border settlements.

This measure will streamline client transactions, reduce time costs, and minimize the risks associated with prolonged asset suspension. It is also important to inform clients about the possibility of faster transfers and the associated procedural changes.

It is important to ensure timely and accurate reporting of such transactions to avoid claims from regulatory authorities. It is recommended that leasing companies update their internal regulations and compliance procedures to reflect these changes.

The Russian Supreme Court will summarize its practice in cases related to artificial intelligence.

These changes are aimed at reducing the burden on the judicial system and expediting case processing. This will allow for more efficient use of simplified and summary procedures, reducing the time and financial costs for clients.

These agreements create a new legal framework for doing business with the UAE and Indonesia, offering simplified procedures and preferential treatment. This opens up opportunities for Russian companies to expand their operations in these markets, but also requires a thorough understanding of the new regulations to minimize risks and ensure compliance.

When working with liabilities exceeding the established limit, it is necessary to plan for opening Type C accounts in advance and be prepared for the process of obtaining conversion permits. This will help avoid delays and potential legal risks when fulfilling financial obligations.

Rosfinmonitoring has prepared a draft order establishing new thresholds for mandatory monitoring of real estate transactions as part of anti-money laundering measures. For banks, the threshold will be 75 million rubles (or the equivalent in foreign currency), and for realtors and other intermediaries, 5 million rubles. Conclusion: Particular attention should be paid to verifying counterparties and the legal origin of funds involved in transactions, as well as the timely submission of all required information.

The Russian government has extended the moratorium on developers paying penalties for existing property buyer claims until the end of 2026. However, it is important to note that the moratorium extension will not affect new claims for penalties from developers who violated shared construction agreements (SCAs) and delivered properties late. The temporary ban on developer liability has been in effect since 2020 and was initially introduced as an anti-crisis measure during the pandemic, and later due to sanctions and economic instability. Conclusion: Lawyers representing equity holders must carefully monitor the date on which claims arise. It is essential to thoroughly analyze each case and apply an appropriate collection strategy.

On January 9, 2026, amendments to the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation (CAP RF) regarding the procedure for scheduling and paying for forensic examinations came into force. Now, the court will scheduling an examination only after the party requesting it has deposited the required amount into a special court account. This change is aimed at improving the efficiency of the judicial process and preventing delays in cases due to non-payment for examinations. Exceptions to the general rule are also provided: citizens who are fully or partially exempt from paying court costs may also be exempt from prepaying for the examination. However, if the funds are not received within the timeframe set by the court, the petition for an examination may be denied. It is important to note that in cases where a case cannot be resolved without an expert opinion, the court retains the right to scheduling an examination on its own initiative. Conclusion: Lawyers must thoroughly inform clients about the new requirements for prepayment of forensic examinations under the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and plan their budget and payment deadlines in advance. Timely compliance with these requirements will help avoid the rejection of motions and delays in litigation.

In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Federal Decree-Law No. 20, effective October 1, 2025, introduced significant changes to the Commercial Companies Law. Key changes include: - the ability for free zone companies to operate on the mainland through branches, - the introduction of non-profit companies, - legal recognition of drag-along and tag-along mechanisms, - the right to establish pre-emptive rights when buying out the shares of deceased shareholders. Furthermore, the procedure for redomiciliation and conversion of limited liability companies (LLCs) to joint stock companies has been simplified. Conclusion: Lawyers should carefully review the new provisions, particularly those related to redomiciliation, the creation of non-profit entities, and shareholder rules. This will allow for effective business structuring, minimizing risks, and taking advantage of the new opportunities offered by the updated UAE legislation. Particular attention should be paid to the rules regarding free zone companies operating on the mainland and the procedure for providing documents to shareholders.

Amendments that significantly increase the maximum compensation amounts for trademark infringement came into force on January 4, 2026. Now, a copyright holder can demand up to 10 million rubles from an infringer instead of damages, doubling the previous maximum. The minimum compensation threshold remains unchanged at 10,000 rubles. Another important change is the court's right to change the compensation calculation method chosen by the copyright holder and award a fixed amount if the stated calculation method proves inapplicable. This means that lawyers will need more thorough preparation and compelling evidence when substantiating the amount of compensation, rather than simply applying a formula. These amendments are aimed at strengthening intellectual property protection and increasing the effectiveness of the fight against counterfeiting. Conclusion: It is important not only to state the amount of compensation but also to support it with compelling evidence, as the court now has the right to change the calculation method. This requires a more in-depth analysis of the circumstances of the case and the preparation of a reasoned position to effectively protect the interests of copyright holders.

Participation in court proceedings involves not only the preparation of procedural documents and positions on the case by the parties to the dispute

Administrative proceedings have their own characteristics, but familiarization with the administrative case in court is an important part of the administrative process.

Participation in court proceedings involves not only the preparation of procedural documents and positions on the case by the parties to the dispute

Obtaining a court decision in practice does not always mean “winning” the dispute

Obtaining a court decision in practice does not always mean “winning” the dispute

The effectiveness of enforcement proceedings is currently quite low due to a number of reasons, one of which is the incorrect actions or inaction of bailiffs.

In order to determine the moment of submission of documents through the “My Arbitrator” system

This issue is regulated by Article 223.1 of the Federal Law "On Bankruptcy", which examines the conditions and procedure for bankruptcy of a citizen in the event of his death.

When initiating bankruptcy proceedings, the creditor, in order to satisfy his claims,

Clause 1 of Article 41 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation establishes the right of a person participating in a case to become familiar with the case materials and make extracts from them.

The bankruptcy trustee (CT) has the right to request the necessary information about the debtor

In this article, lawyers from the Sudokhod company outline fifteen of the most popular ways to postpone a court hearing.

In arbitration proceedings, the submission of documents in electronic form is actively practiced